Ekta means Unity. The word is currently fashionable among the Indians both at home and abroad. It has the sanction of the ruling masters of Delhi who control the media (A.LR.) and the whip (the Armed Forces). It is a nice word and gets a lot of sympathy from those who lump all the “Indians” together as if they are frogs. Anyone against Ekta is branded antisocial or terrorist. So let’s look closely at the reality.

India indeed had a lot of Ekta until August 1947. On that day her leaders VOLUNTARILY threw it out like a dirty rag. Did anyone go on fast in protest? On that day India became AZAD Kashmir, EAST Pakistan, WEST, Pakistan and finally, what was left over, acquired the official name of Bharat, Todays India is a fragment of the real thing, Her Ekta is the figment of her new masters imagination, With Khyber and Sylhet out and Srinagar and Amritsar in, she is illegal, immoral, ILLOGICAL and INDEFENSIBLE. She is sheer NONSENSE. If anyone does not see the writing on the wall it is not the fault of the Truth, the Almighty or the writer.

Why did the Muslims keep India together for eight centuries? Did they have every ones (the MAJORITY community’s consent?

The greater the conquest, the greater the glory of Islam and of the conqueror. An Akbar or an Aurangzeb ruling the country from Baluchistan to Bengal was a grand Emperor. Who would have recalled either of them later had he ruled only a few districts around Delhi? They say, “The sword of Islam held India together and made the Hindus eat the dust and Jove Ekta.”

Why did the British hold India together?

The larger the colony, the greater the economic return and exploitation. The more the slaves, the greater the fruits of their labor. Just look at the prosperity of England and her grand Victorian mansions and buildings. All of India was a market for England’s goods and India contributed a lot towards both the World Wars. Would Britain have benefited so well had her Indian colony been of the size of Goa or Ponicherry? They say, “The guns of Britain held India together and made the Hindus (including the turban wearing symbol carrying castes) love Ekta.

So who would want to keep India together today, denying freedom to the various nations living there (some of them different from each other as the Belgians from the Dutch, as the British from the Bulgarians)? The answer is, India’s new colonial masters. But why? Because the greater the colony, the greater the power and glory of Pandit Nehru, Indira and Rajiv Gandhi. That is why they refuse to rule country any smaller, say, the size of Libya, Saudi Arabia or Portugal or even Great Britain, It is also easier to divide and rule, to put the Poorbians against the Sikhs than to put a Naga against a Naga.

Today the Whip of Islam and the Gun of Great Britain have been replaced by State Terror and large scale brain-washing of the Indians by the House of Nehru and their stooges, lackeys, henchmen and bootlickers. This isn’t the India of Krishna or Rama, Shivaji or Guru Gobind Singh but of dirt and filth, nepotism and corruption, treachery and fraud, of mental dwarfs and subservient slaves.

When the enslaved nations of India acquire the self-respect and dignity of the Spaniards or the Swiss, the Burmese or the Nepalese, they will break their shackles, smash their prison walls and ESCAPE, to rule themselves,

Today small nations even in Africa (e.g. Senegal and Kenya) are free. But those in South Asia are slaves. Among them you find the Tamils, the Telegus, the Assamese, the Nagas, the Marhattas, the Rajputs, the Kashmiris and the Sikhs,

The days of the Fraud of Ekta are numbered; Each nation will be free upon this Earth. Each man will walk with dignity and pass it on to his children.

Yours Truly, R. Singh

Dear Editor,

The way the Sikhs involved in “Explosive” making and “Conspiracy” charges have been dealt with by the Montreal Session Court should be sufficient to serve as an eye-opener that indulgence in violence abroad, for the cause at home, is not only an utterly misguided emotional attempt to solve the problem but is also counterproductive in itself.

Sikhs abroad can best serve through their exemplary peace loving behavior and non-violent active propaganda. By indulgence in violence, you only help your enemy strengthening their claim, and you do more harm than good to the cause. Loke Sabha Speaker Dr. Jhakar has rightly put (1A 6/13) that action of Sikhs in Canada has little effect on how the situation in India was handled by the Indian Government. By breaking the law and peace of the country that you have chosen to ma ate ton for whatever reasons you unwittingly prove to be “terrorists”, which you are not; and thus loose the support of the Government and the country for posing as an unworthy citizen.

Use of violence may be justified, under certain circumstances, in India, but its indulgence is certainly not conducive to the conditions prevailing presently abroad. Concern of the Sikhs abroad for the cause of their native land is appreciable and understandable, but it should be rationally channelized not to be deterrent to the cause itself. At present the Sikhs are dumbly playing into the hands of their oppressors as the already sect ionized community is being further turned apart into petty parties to shatter their strength. The paramount need today is to consolidate ourselves as one single unit else we fritter our resources and perish,

NARENDRA SINGH

Dear Editor:

The news that the Chief minister Barnala had been pardoned for his sins for sending Police into the Golden Temple Complex on April 30, on offering Rs 101.00 for Karah Parshad on the occassion of Akhand Path Bogh ceremony is anything but exhilarating, In the same token, could Indira Gandhi be also excused of her misadventure, if she had offered 1 lakh rupees for Karah Parshad and agreed to polish shoes in a gurdwara for say a month or even a year? We have made a fool of ourselves, not only in the eyes of Hindus and non-Sikhs but also Sikhs as well and the practice must cease forthwith. I urge it is high time that the Sikh Priests be deprived to sit on judgment much less on vital matters like this, as Masands and Mahants were made to cease the ownership of Gurdwaras.

Narendra Singh.

Article extracted from this publication >> June 27, 1986