The All India Congress Committee at its meeting held at Allahabad in April 1942, passed a resolution in clear terms accepting the principle of indivisibility of India Bharatkh and Mr, C.Rajgopalachariar (now His Excellency C.Rajgopalachariar) suffered a defeat in this meeting and had to leave the Congress on that account. The Congress had not given consent for the section prior to the 5rd of June 1947, while fighting the elections of 1945, the Congress in their manifesto declared that they will not allow the creation of Pakistan and that they would oppose any demand that may be based on communal interests. The series of lectures given by Sardar Patel at the time was a regular campaign against Pakistan. But when the Mountbatten Plan i. e, the Pakistan Plan was put before the leaders, Gandhiji and the members of our present Government who were the Congress leader’s en gave their consent to this Plan without consulting the people.
It may be that it may have been found to be impracticable to consult all the’ people but it was not at all impossible for the Congress leaders to convene a cone Reference of the leaders of all the parties in the Country. But these leaders did not even consult the Working Committee or the All India Congress Committee before they gave their consent to the Mountbatten Plan, They first gave their consent to it and afterwards imposed on the All-India Congress Committee, I have no doubt that in the history of the whole of the world this action of the so-called leaders of the people, which clearly amounts to deceit, could be the only one of its kind, 1948 and the coercion of the Indian Government into the payment of-Rs,55 crores to Pakistan was the result of that fast.
(37) In order to please the Musalman he made an unprovoked scurrilous attack in 1924, about 24 years ago, on the Arya .Samaj and castigated the Samaj for its supposed sins of commissions and omissions. The Arya Samaj resented it very much, put Gandhiji consistent policy of hostility towards
Arya: Sama j under the cloak of impartiality ultimately destroyed the Arya Samaj as a political weapon whatever may be its value sect.
(38) Gandhiji opposition to the adoption of Hinds as a national language of the Indian Union and his insistance on Hindustani instead – a Language which is only spoken as a dialect and has neither grammar nor literature, This wag also done to please the Musalman; and it went to the grotesque length of describing Maharaja Ram as Bad shah RAM and Sati Sitadevi as begum Sita Vasishtha Muni was to be as Maulana Vasishtha.
(39) He was also not in favour of Devnagari being only in the which the national language was to be written.
(40) The Nizam’s territory had 86 percent of Hindu population out of 18 million, Yet the whole administration was done on the basis of the Muslim conquest of the Hindus. Yet throughout the last 20 years Gandhi ji stood up for the Nizam and even declared that he would welcome the Nizam as the Emperor of free India.
(41) Gandhiji treatment of the Indian States differed according as the ruler was a Hindu or a Musalman, Gwalior Kashmir, Jaipur, Bhavnagar, Rajkot and other princes’ fell into his dis favour because they were Hindus. Hyderabad, Bhopal was favoured because the rulers were Muslims.
(42) Gandhiji profession of non-violence was also an act of opportunism expediency Whenever he liked he openly supported violence. In 1914-18 he recruited for 2 the British support of thé War.
(43) He often lightly talked a of leaving India to God and anarchy in pursuit of his political aims and launched ‘activities which resulted in bloodshed, neon, destruction of, Hindu and property.
(44) In Kashmir he actually pressed on Pandit Nehru’ to send the Indian army to the help of Sheikh Abdullah inspite of his so-called non-violence. ‘
(45) Some Muslims, disliked the National Anthem ‘Vande Mataram’ and thereupon the Mahatma disfavored either the singing or the recital of it wherever me could help “it..
(46) In 1946 when the Mahatma was searching for truth-with a lantern in Naokhali and some Musalman objected to the National Flag being flown on his hut and he ordered it to be removed.
(47) Gandhiji publicly banned the recital or perusal: of Shiv bhavani, a beautiful collection of 52 verses by a Hindu poet enrolling the great power and the achievement of Shivaji. The Mahatma banned it because it offended Muslims.
(48) The ostentatious manifestation of Catholicism on the part of the Mahatma in reading Quran in Hindu temples and even on the occasion of the funeral of Mrs.Gandhi is an out- rage on the religious sentiments of hundreds of millions of Hindus. But the Mahatma never had the courage even of attempting to read the Bhagavad Geeta in a Mosque.
(49) While recuperating at Poona after his serious illness the Mahatma in 1945 secretly authorised Mr. Bhula bhai Desai to grant 50/50 representation to the Muslims and to arrange for a conference by the Viceroy for resolving the “political deadlock,
(50) The cabinet mission of 1946 did the double trick of rejecting the partition of India and at the same time introducing it by the back door, Gandhiji advise a the Congress to accept it in
(51) But Mr. Jinnah wanted his pound of flesh ‘Pakistan and nothing less and ultimately on the and of June 1947 Pakistan was conceded to the people or ascertaining their Opinion, and the Mahatma advised the people to accept it.
(52) For years, 90 per cent of the Hindu populations of Hyderabad were groaning under the religious persecution and social disabilities but hot once has the Mahatma uttered one word of protest,
(53) The attitude of Gandhiji towards Bhopal was typical of his love for the Muslims. That State was notorious for the forcible conversion of the Hindus. Mahatma described it as Ram raj.
(54) A cruel if not deliberate misunderstanding of the programme and policy of the Hindu Mahasabha which has a programme and a policy fully national, democratic and non- communal, Its activities were no more than a sincere attempt to very halt to the suicidal and anti-national policy which was pursued by the Congress under the leadership of the Mahatma for appeasing the Musalman at Goss with the results which are now well-known, namely ‘Pakistan).
(55) While this case has been proceeding the Government of India have at -last taken courage to challenge the mediaeval and feudal policy of the Nizam and his systematic suppression of the Hindus politically, religiously and economically throughout. This house of cards has fallen in five days, and one crore and 70 lakhs of Hindus who were groaning under his tyranny have now got some chance of self-expression, It would not be very difficult to envisage as to what would have happened if Gandhi ji was alive, It can safely be said that he would have gone into another fast unto death to stop the invasion of the Nizam’s State, and Nehru Government in their helplessness would have done ‘anything to please and save Mahatmaji. But in his absence snow Government have taken the right action and have pat, an end to the Nizam’s autocracy finally shattered the fetish of non-violence which the Mahatma ostentatiously preached all these 30 years to an incredulous world.
