Since the beginning, the Hindu Nazi parties are committed to Hindu, Hindi and Hindustan their aims and objects are well known . Therefore, the Ayodhya struggle should not be considered as between modem Rambhakts and the Muslims in India. It is certainly not a fight for religious faith. It is 4 part of power struggle for overall control over the socioeconomic, political, religious and cultural aspects of Indian society.

The present day Hindutva heroes are fighting for the restoration of the old discredited brahminical social order (BSO) based on the barbaric, slavesystem of caste and chaturvama.

Hence, it is not a fight for the protection of Hinduism but for the supremacy of Brahmanism. It is a fight for the head of Shambuka and the thumb of Ekalavya.

 Upper caste rule:

 Ultimately, it is a fight for the imposition of the rule of a few upper castes over the majority of Indians. Certainly this cannot be achieved as long as Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar’s Constitution of India remains. That is why the Hindu Nazis have systematically campaigned against the constitution of India as a sovereign, secular, democratic republic.

 Nazi philosopher: Golwalkar in Sept.1949 had publicly voiced at Lucknow the RSS criticism of the Indian Constitution which he termed as “unBharat”. It is in line with *his that the sadhus and mahants of the Nazi parties made the constitution of India as their prime target. Manu’s constitution:

On Jan. 1 1993 at a press conference in New Delhi, Muktanand Saraswati and Vamdev spared no word in condemning the Constitution of India. The constitution, according to them only amounted to perpetuating the imperialist system of the British and was not at all equipped to promote a homogeneous ‘Rashtriyata’ (nationhood) in the country. Vamdev revealed that the “Sant Samiti’ at its meeting on Oct.1314 1992 had set up a four member committee to rework the “antiHindu Constitution” to suit the country’s needs, obviously based on the Dharmasastra of the brahminical lawgiver, Manu.

 AntiDalit stand: Reports said that the committee headed by Muktanand has already prepared a 70page draft constitution in which he castigates the Constitution of India and explains how its various aspects are contra dietary and useless. Their main objection is to the special rights given in the Constitution to the minorities (Muslims and Christians) but they are also against the Scheduled Castes and Tribes.

 SC/ST reservations:

Muktanand said “There should be no reservation on the basis of caste, language or religion. There should be uniform laws for everybody. Also the state should not interfere in religious and personal matters. There should be no laws regarding marriage. This antinational, antirational and ant constitutional movement of Nazi parties has given a call to the people to overthrow Dr. Ambedkar’s Constitution because it is “un Hindu”, not in tune with the Hindu Rashtra.

Ram Bhaktas:

‘The constitutional law has never accepted the principle of permanency. The Constitution of India like all others has provided for change. The Constitution is a product of the wishes and aspirations of the people of India. It is the law given to the people by the people themselves through the Constituent Assembly. In a true sense the document is a charter of a new society based on liberty, equality, fraternity and justice to all.

 The Constitution does not mean only the Articles and provisions. No constitution could be well understood without the relevance of constitutional morality and conventions. But how this can be known to our modem Rambhakts who conceive India in a medieval period? These Nazis after having conducted an unprecedented assault on secular India, the Supreme Court and the rule of law are now after the very Constitution Itself. But the trishultoting sadhus and Rambhakts have lost the wisdom to know that no faith is above law and no temple is bigger than the Constitution, no religion is above the humanity, no nation can be built solely on the foundation of religion.

Barbaric face:

It is therefore for the people of India to decide whether they should be governed by the existing Constitution of India or the Constitution of Manu representing the barbaric face of Brahmanism.

The dream of these sadhus and mahants is to return to the cruel chaturvarna (caste system), the principal cause of India’s backwardness and slavery in which the upper castes will have the unhindered freedom to enslave us, What they want is the rectums of the laws of Manu (which is impossible) where the Brahmins will be worshiped like gods. This is not a painted picture of Hindu Rashtra. But it is the aim of sadhus and mahants of the Nazi parties.

 Vajpayee’s clarification; Niranjandev Tirth, a former Shankarachari of Puri, accused the RSS of tampering with the shastras. He warned the RSS would not be allowed to interfere with the Hindu Shastras and customs when it came to power in Delhi. He criticized the RSS for not believing in the vamashram (caste system). On the other hand\ BJP leader Vajpayee had said that “no question of a return to the Varna  system ”:The Dharma Sansad (religious parliament) has clarified that it stands by the Constitution. There is no question of Manusmriti (the Hindu book of conduct written by Manu sometime between the first and second century AD) being implemented.

Only time will be able to tell us what was in the mind of these Nazi parties, it has very cunningly used the policy of doublespeak through its own Brahmin bania press.

Keshayanand Bharati case: However, within the existing framework it is: difficult for the Nazis to” tamper with Dr.Ambedkar’s Constitution. For fundamental changes, the Constitution of India calls for special procedure. Besides, the Supreme Court of India charged with the task of protecting the Constitution will restrict any unruly govt The Supreme Court has already performed this task in the Keshavanand Bharati Case by invoking the “basic structure” theory. Any radical change to be made has to clear the test of “basic Structure”, And this will be determined by the Supreme Court and not by any political party or group of parties. It is therefore submitted that so long as the Supreme Court of India survives and upholds the “basic structure” theory no radical changes could be made In the present Constitution. Besides, replacement in entirety of the existing Constitution is not permitted and also an impossible task. Hence assuming that the Nazi parties will come to power in Delhi they will not be able to destroy the existing Constitution.

Article extracted from this publication >>  August 20, 1993